← Search

Shannon Yanoff

— year-end
16 matches · 3W–13L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shannon Yanoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-07-14 · A18 2.5W BA Johnson · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Christina Cannata / Michelle Taylor
2026-07-07 · A18 2.5W BA Johnson · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Pamela Blossom / Deborah Stephens
2026-06-16 · A18 2.5W BA Johnson · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Reva Barner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2021-09-24 · C 6.5W BA Pavlish · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-06 · A18 3.0W BA Pavlish · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Zingales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2021-06-29 · A18 3.0W BA Pavlish · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-06-08 · A18 3.0W BA Pavlish · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Zingales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2019-10-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Pollack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
Lynn Sandstrom / Amanda Sandstrom
2019-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anupama Krishnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2019-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Zingales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2019-07-01 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2019-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dina Rendinell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Teams4 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 37% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer