← Search

Jennifer Mitchell

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 164W–142L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Mitchell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history306 matches
W
2026-06-29 · Love All · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsey Melby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Miller/Larsen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelli Fredback
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsey Melby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Miller/Larsen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Grunke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-11 · Miller/Larsen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer McEntee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-09 · Miller/Larsen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelli Fredback
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-03 · Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · Miller/Larsen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-07 · Shot Sisters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-05 · Shot Sisters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Scribner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
79.5%
31W–8L · 61.3% of games
4.0
46.3%
50W–58L · 48.7% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.4% of games
8.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 47.1% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.6% of games
7.5mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
58.5%
24W–17L · 50.9% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
140 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
54 matches
#1 Singles
6%
18 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer