← Search

Pete Cassidy

— year-end
178 matches · 100W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pete Cassidy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
L
2026-07-26 · SOL: Chip 'n Charge: Murray · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Bepler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · KH: Cassidy/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Blazovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · KH: Cassidy/Nelson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-28 · KH: Cassidy/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Mccall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · KH: Cassidy/Nelson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · KH: Cassidy/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Garrett Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · KH: Cassidy/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geoffrey Sweitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · KH: Cassidy/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · KH: Cassidy/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Bepler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · SOL: Chip 'n Charge: Murray · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Blazovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · SOL: Chip 'n Charge: Murray · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · KH:Double Deuces:Cassidy/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Bepler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
55.1%
65W–53L · 51.4% of games
7.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams