← Search

Tanja Mletzko

— year-end
37 matches · 24W–13L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Tanja Mletzko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rose Prejean-Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rose Prejean-Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · with Lonnie Bynum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lonnie Bynum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-20 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lonnie Bynum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-12-13 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacrymosa Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-22 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-24 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Quay Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Kerry O'Gorman / Oanh Tran
2025-08-05 · #4 Doubles · with Lucinda Merriweather championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 4-6
L
MC Nguyen / Soo Monahon
2025-07-27 · #2 Doubles · with Jordan Browne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-12 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marsha Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-07-02 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Webb-Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
64%
16W–9L · 54.4% of games
3.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal