← Search

Jennifer Jones

Austin, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 57W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Miss Hits · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Miss Hits · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Miss Hits · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Esther Torres / Jennifer Erickson
2026-06-20 · Miss Hits · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Korb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-28 · Haute Dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Cranis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-09 · Miss Hits · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-25 · Hot Dogs 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · Miss Hits · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Oldham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Timmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
68.9%
42W–19L · 57.3% of games
4.0
41.7%
15W–21L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe