← Search

Jane Hill

MINNEAPOLIS, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 33W–23L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jane Hill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-06-25 · ALLEX IB-Pro-Fun 40s · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richelle Audiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Jensen: 55's Summer 26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Henrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Jensen: 55's Summer 26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theresa Harich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Borthwick: Net Returns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Bykowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Borthwick: Net Returns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Jensen: 55's Summer 26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Dolphin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-20 · Borthwick: Net Returns · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Gosz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · ALLEX IB-Pro-Fun 40s · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · Borthwick: Net Returns · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-09 · Miller/Gordon 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Zierke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-09 · Jensen: 55's Winter 26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theresa Harich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-02 · Miller/Gordon 18+ 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 50.8% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games
8.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova