← Search

Jennifer Davis

Piedmont, SC
0.0 year-end
71 matches · 37W–34L · seasons 2016–2019

Captains: add Jennifer Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
Kim Tyler / Andrea Skrobola
2019-11-11 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Slagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Nancy Kohl / Mary Walsh
2019-11-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Holli Mayher / Maryanne Spivey
2019-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Dodds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
Emily Oglesby
2019-10-25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-5
L
Terri Errington / Anne Smith
2019-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Dodds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Susan Lessenberry / Kerry Plum
2019-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gay Dupree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Linda Murphy / Carlynn Eisner
2019-09-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Trexler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Vickie Fuller / Ellen Coia
2019-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Dodds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Katherine Hughes / Kathy Townes
2019-09-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Deana Fisher / Sandra Franklin
2019-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanna Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Cathy Feinstein / Jennifer Bruynell
2019-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Katie van Valkinburgh / Franciesca Serem
2019-04-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanna Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 53.8% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 20% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.4% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova