Kiwon Nam
Naperville, IL
183 matches · 97W–86L · seasons 2023–2027
Captains: add Kiwon Nam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history183 matches
W
Ronnie Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Stephen Miller / Daniel TerHaar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Carlos Flores / Sammy Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Connor Moelmann / Nick Sternowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-5, 1-0
W
Josh Blumenfeld / Chris Wittenborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
Adrian Ciuca / Christopher Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2023–2027
CHI E 18M4.0 9.Tam Nam Sun 5 $25
CHI E 18M4.5 4.Tam Liu Sat 7 $25
CHI E M18.8.0 8.Wilm Nemec Sat 3 $20
NITA E 40M18c Naperville-Podwika/Esancy
CDTA E 18&OM4.0 8Oak OMalley Sun 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OM4.0 7.STP Zhou Sat 10 $22
CDTA S 18&OM4.5 1.Tam Liu Sat 11 $22
CDTA S TriMHi 3.NTC Podwika Tue 7 $24
CDTA W 18&OM4.0 11.OBTC OMalley Sun 7 $22
CDTA W 18&OM4.5 7.CPE Sitar Sat 4 $28
CDTA W M18&O8.0 2.Wlmt Nemec Sat 3 $20
NITA E 40M18a Naperville-Podwika/Esancy
NITA S 40M18c TAM-Liu/Hu
NITA S 85CMa TAM-Lin/Niam
NITA W 40M18c Naperville-Podwika/Esancy
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
26W–13L · 58.2% of games
4.0
50.5%
50W–49L · 50.3% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 29.6% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 59% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 38.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
44 matches
#2 Singles
18%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
26 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.