← Search

Michael Cochran

— year-end
32 matches · 15W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michael Cochran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Buffy Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Buffy Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Buffy Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-05 · Bailey/BV/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Austin Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-04 · Bailey/BV/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Gravette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Popejoy/BV/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Humphrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-02 · Bailey/BV/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Popejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-17 · Watkins/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Popejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-13 · Bailey/BV/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Popejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-11 · Watkins/Bentonville/KTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Hurley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-08 · Watkins/Bentonville/KTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Popejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-15 · Bailey/BV/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Popejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 48.7% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.1% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert