← Search

Jigisha Thaker

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 64W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jigisha Thaker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-08-24 · JThaker (BCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gaye Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · SNewman (BCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gaye Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-19 · SNewman (BCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melodie Ohaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · JThaker (BCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Krista Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · JThaker (BCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathalie Malter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · MLynch (BCC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-13 · CDeLorenzo (Balllantyne CC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with January Crimin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-25 · MLynch (BCC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Stepp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-15 · JThaker (BCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Krista Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-09-01 · JThaker (BCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sheri Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-08-29 · CJensen (BCC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffani Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-08-18 · JThaker (BCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sheri Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 53.4% of games
4.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 46.8% of games
6.5
71.4%
25W–10L · 57.4% of games
7.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer