← Search

David Barnhart

Bogart, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 20W–22L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add David Barnhart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-09-10 · ATC Barr/Barnhart · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-03 · ATC Barr/Barnhart · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Czarick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · ATC/Gattiker (MXD 3.5) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Grimes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-02 · ATC/Gattiker (MXD 3.5) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Imrie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · ATC Gattiker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Grimes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-24 · ATC/Gattiker (MXD 3.5) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Imrie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · ATC Gattiker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Grimes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-09 · ATC Gattiker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Grimes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-19 · COTA/David Barnhart · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-03 · COTA/David Barnhart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ted Tarpley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-12 · COTA/David Barnhart · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ted Tarpley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-04 · COTA/David Barnhart · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Czarick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 48.4% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.5% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams