← Search

Mary Volf

— year-end
93 matches · 59W–34L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mary Volf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
Katy Harris / Kristin Baker
2026-06-22 · MPTC - Tully · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah-Jane Jackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · LLTC - Hagle · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Berklee Baay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · LLTC - Hagle · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Massey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-19 · LLTC - Hagle · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Berklee Baay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Erica Sprague / Kristin Baker
2026-05-18 · MPTC - Tully · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diana Tully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · LLTC - Hagle · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sydney Kerns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · LLTC - Hagle · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Hagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-27 · MPTC - Tully · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tammy Nasse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · MPTC - Tully · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Zdeblick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · MPTC - Stryke Force · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with SIMONA Toliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-17 · MPTC - Stryke Force · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Stryker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-12 · MPTC - Stryke Force · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paige Hagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
93.1%
27W–2L · 66.4% of games
4.5
54.4%
31W–26L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Singles
16%
15 matches
#2 Singles
11%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert