← Search

Amy Lee

Lawrence, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 46W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Kenoly, Jacqueline · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · Neidert, Pamela · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Neidert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · Kenoly, Jacqueline · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Jaimez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · Neidert, Pamela · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Cannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · Kenoly, Jacqueline · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Jaimez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-11 · Neidert, Pamela · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Seitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-09 · Kenoly, Jacqueline · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-04 · Neidert, Pamela · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Hilbrands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · Neidert, Pamela · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Cannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-5
W
2026-04-26 · Kenoly, Jacqueline · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Jaimez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · Kenoly, Jacqueline · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · Neidert, Pamela · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maren Steiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
35.7%
41W–74L · 45.1% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer