← Search

Catherine O'Connell

Dublin, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 108W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine O'Connell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
W
2026-06-26 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Hellyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisa Sagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-05 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Hellyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-11 · Elysium 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Borgemenke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · Elysium 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Sampsel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Pamela Smith / Cathy Kuzma
2026-05-07 · Elysium 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-23 · Elysium 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisa Sagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Lori Russell / Alison Scott
2026-03-26 · Elysium 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Grunert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-03-19 · Elysium 2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alisa Sagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Ami Latham / Kelly Schlessman
2026-03-16 · Elysium 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randi Rasar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-5
W
2026-02-12 · Elysium 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Walter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · Elysium 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Kittrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.5%
72W–45L · 54.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 31.4% of games
7.0
62.8%
27W–16L · 54.6% of games
7.5
20%
8W–32L · 38.6% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
51 matches
#2 Singles
14%
30 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer