Svetlana Kanev
Evanston, IL
263 matches · 123W–140L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Svetlana Kanev to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history263 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Jennifer Lee / Julie Safranski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-5
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-4, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-5, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 2.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $25
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 2Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 7Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 6.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 8.Wlmt Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 6.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
NITA S 35W18d TAM-Lobo-Corey
NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
48.6%
88W–93L · 50.3% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 29.7% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 54.8% of games
7.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.6% of games
7.5
34.5%
10W–19L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 38.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
97 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
18 matches
#2 Singles
6%
15 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.