← Search

Ann Bonadeo

— year-end
98 matches · 60W–38L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Ann Bonadeo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2023-05-02 · Greens 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-04-18 · Greens 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2023-03-20 · OKC: No Sorrys/ECC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolinda Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-10-17 · OKC: No Sorrys/ECC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Reding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-09-12 · OKC: No Sorrys/ECC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolinda Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-06-19 · OK/Woody/Mixed18&over 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-06-08 · Passed: No Sorry's · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2022-05-31 · OKC: Prince-Freeman/Greens · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alice Dorris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2022-05-24 · OKC: Prince-Freeman/Greens · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Reding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-05-22 · OK/Woody/Mixed18&over 8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Pappas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2022-05-18 · Passed: No Sorry's · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-05-11 · Passed: No Sorry's · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne McKinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams17 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
90%
9W–1L · 60.6% of games
4.0
61.9%
39W–24L · 54.2% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 34.6% of games
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 63.2% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer