← Search

Julie Arness

Cathlamet, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 86W–58L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Julie Arness to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-09-12 · MVTC-Morrison/Arness · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Derby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Wesley Eader championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-09 · MVTC-Kardas/Simons · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wesley Eader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · MVTC-Kardas/Simons · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wesley Eader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · VTC-Nadig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · VTC-Nadig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Simons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-22 · VTC-Nadig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-03 · VTC-Nadig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Simons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · MV-Morrison/Arness · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Derby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-11-08 · MV-Morrison/Arness · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Derby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-11-01 · MV-Morrison/Arness · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Derby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2025-10-26 · MV-Morrison/Arness · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Derby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2011–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 56.4% of games
7.0
55.8%
29W–23L · 55.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
30W–15L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert