← Search

Liz Romagnano

— year-end
203 matches · 128W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Liz Romagnano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
L
2026-04-20 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Midge Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Elizabeth Miller / Christine Mitchell
2026-04-16 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ami Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Hutson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Jennifer Love / Jane Freer
2026-03-29 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Bezold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-26 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ami Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Joy Hale / Elizabeth Miller
2026-03-23 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Libby Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Hutson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-03-15 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Hutson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Spitale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-03-09 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Libby Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Hutson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-15 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurel Elmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Teams44 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
63.3%
100W–58L · 55.7% of games
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.5% of games
7.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
76 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer