← Search

Rachel Szafarczyk

— year-end
61 matches · 22W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Szafarczyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Hartman/Garland · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-07-10 · Hartman/Garland · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · Hartman/Garland · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · Hartman/Garland · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Rebecca Ashare / Aimee Miller
2026-06-23 · Hartman/Garland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Thielen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · Hartman/Garland · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Erin OConnor-Sage / Joe O'Connor
2026-02-15 · Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phillip Ham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-08 · Llamas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Layton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-06 · Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Atallah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-15 · Hartman/Garland · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-08 · Hartman/Garland · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
W
2025-07-01 · Hartman/Garland · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
31.1%
14W–31L · 43.5% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#1 Singles
15%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King