← Search

Sydney Taggart

LOS ANGELES, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 68W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sydney Taggart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
L
2025-11-14 · SAC-Gatzke · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Gatzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-02 · SAC-Gatzke · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Gatzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-09-06 · SAC-Gatzke · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Gatzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-07-19 · SAC-Yu/Yu · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Ferschweiler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-12 · SAC-Yu/Yu · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin von Haartman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-09 · Taggart-Summer Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anabella Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-07 · SAC-Yu/Yu · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin von Haartman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-07 · Taggart-Summer Fun · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Yuko Hopman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca Redding championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-05-24 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Valyrie Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-23 · SAC-Harwood 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rajan Madhusudan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2012–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
48.7%
38W–40L · 47.7% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 51% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
35.7%
15W–27L · 46.5% of games
9.0mixed
17.1%
6W–29L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#1 Singles
13%
23 matches
#2 Singles
9%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova