← Search

Catherine Teran

New Albany, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 65W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Teran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-05-01 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-10 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-13 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-03-06 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-11 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-23 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carmela Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-12-08 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yvette DeLisio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-5, 0-1
L
Pat Rothney / Kelly Schlessman
2025-11-03 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-20 · New Albany · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chandra Panley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Katie Chapman / Jennifer Stanich
2025-09-15 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lily Duan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-25 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 49.3% of games
4.0
54%
47W–40L · 52.3% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 57% of the time
#1 Singles
57%
70 matches
#2 Singles
17%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal