← Search

Elena Bailey

Cedar Park, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 38W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elena Bailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-05-29 · Serve Us Another · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Mcwhorter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-24 · Serve Us Another · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monifa Cambrelen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-17 · Serve Us Another · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Troyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-27 · Serve Us Another · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jane Riedlinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-20 · Serve Us Another · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Mcwhorter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-13 · Serve Us Another · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Mcwhorter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-07 · Racq Pacq 3.0 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monifa Cambrelen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Barajas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Groner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
45.3%
24W–29L · 50.4% of games
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 50.8% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer