← Search

MARILYN PORTER

Des Moines, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 111W–104L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add MARILYN PORTER to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
L
2026-09-12 · BETC-Hollar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Hollar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Wakefield championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Wakefield championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-21 · BETC-Higashi 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victor Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-12 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Hollar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Blegen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Hollar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · BETC-Ikeda 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Morse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
40.8%
20W–29L · 46.6% of games
3.5
25%
8W–24L · 43% of games
6.0
53.6%
30W–26L · 52% of games
7.0
61.8%
21W–13L · 54.2% of games
6.0mixed
84%
21W–4L · 62.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
60 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer