← Search

Kim Pulnik

— year-end
196 matches · 87W–109L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kim Pulnik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
L
Karen Johnson / Bob Nelson
2026-09-11 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Dronova/Pulnik · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Rosenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-08 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Luke/Dronova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irina Dronova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Luke/Dronova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheng Jiang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Pulnik · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michaela Hardimon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Luke/Dronova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irina Dronova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Pulnik · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Newville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-19 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Pulnik · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michaela Hardimon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Luke/Dronova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheng Jiang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Luke/Dronova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irina Dronova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-27 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Luke/Dronova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vioanny Adon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Luke/Dronova · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alesya Stamova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-07 · WAY:Wayside:Pulnik · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Svetlan Todorov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
9W–9L · 47.9% of games
3.5
48%
36W–39L · 49.6% of games
7.0
39.5%
17W–26L · 47.8% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.6% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
17W–34L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
62 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams