← Search

Erica Washkill

Fleming Island, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 11W–9L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Erica Washkill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Eagle Harbor - Jones · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kellie Philips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-06 · Eagle Harbor - Jones · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-19 · Eagle Harbor - Jones · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aimee Davidow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
Kathy Evans / Diane Forhan
2026-07-12 · Eagle Harbor - Jones · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kandee Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-17 · Eagle Harbor - Rouse · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Eagle Harbor - Rouse · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sita Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · Eagle Harbor - Rouse · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-26 · Eagle Harbor - Rouse · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · Eagle Harbor - Rouse · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Fritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-09-07 · Eagle Harbor Jones · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jolene Hamel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-08-09 · Eagle Harbor Jones · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jolene Hamel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-06-28 · Eagle Harbor - Rouse · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.6% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal