← Search

Bryan Poss

San Antonio, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 24W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Bryan Poss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-06-27 · Bandits '26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · 8.5 Bandits · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bobby Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · 9.5 Bandits · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Travis Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · 9.5 Bandits · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Travis Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · 9.5 Bandits · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Chris Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Noah de Luna / Jeffrey Chang
2026-06-12 · 9.5 Bandits · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Ashwin Bhat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Gavin Grivel / Thomas Mills
2026-05-15 · Bandits '26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Bandits '26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Gitter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-18 · Bandits '26 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · The Old Gang · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bobby Duran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · Hurt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hector Trevino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-21 · Hurt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hector Trevino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 52.2% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
100%
7W–0L · 72.6% of games
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova