← Search

Jurga Petrikis

Matthews, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 63W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jurga Petrikis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-09-08 · TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Ranadive
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-22 · TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tasha Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-18 · TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Cosmo McCorkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Lara Aboulhosn / Jennifer Johnson
2026-08-04 · TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Ranadive
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tano Failla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madhava Kalakota mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Prickett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Fellers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mario Sansotta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Prickett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · SStaley/SHerndon (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Staley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-19 · MWolf/JShelley (WSRC) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
60.6%
40W–26L · 56.3% of games
5.5
30%
3W–7L · 42.4% of games
6.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.3% of games
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#1 Singles
12%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova