← Search

Kathleen Kircher

— year-end
33 matches · 14W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Kircher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-07-21 · SFT:Spark-A: Ehlbeck · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Shumway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · SFT:Spark-A: Ehlbeck · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · SFT:Spark-A: Ehlbeck · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Keegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · SFT:Spark-A: Ehlbeck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · SFT:Spark-A: Ehlbeck · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Masterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · SFT:Spark-A Green:Warren · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Paonessa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-07-29 · SFT:Spark:Ehlbeck/Sideman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Shumway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-23 · SFT:Spark:White:Sideman/Moon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Mazzocca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-06-24 · SFT:Spark:Ehlbeck/Sideman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Shumway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-06-10 · SFT:Spark:Ehlbeck/Sideman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Kijanka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-05-21 · SFT:Spark:White:Sideman/Moon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Mazzocca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5, 0-1
W
2025-05-13 · SFT:Spark:Ehlbeck/Sideman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracy Surette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.2% of games
8.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer