← Search

Jodi Thomas

New Albany, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 61W–36L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jodi Thomas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2025-04-13 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheri Lehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
L
2025-03-16 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Greco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-09 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Greco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-02 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheri Lehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-02-09 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Scali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
2025-01-26 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Scali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-11-24 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Greco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-10-27 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Knoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-10-06 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheri Lehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-12-17 · New Albany 1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2023-10-29 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gena Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-10-15 · New Albany 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Knoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
62.9%
61W–36L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams