← Search

Anna Womack

Honolulu, HI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 88W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anna Womack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
L
2026-08-01 · OCToo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Creighton Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-18 · OC Tri Tri Again · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Madriaga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · OCToo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with DANNY LEUNG mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-04 · OCToo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with DANNY LEUNG mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · OC Tri Tri Again · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keiko Fleischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · OCToo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Tria Mercado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · Koa Wahine 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · Koa Wahine 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pauline Castro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · Ruru Remons · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · Ruru Remons · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · Ruru Remons · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joni Tamayo-Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-02 · Ruru Remons · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keiko Fleischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 59.4% of games
4.0
35.9%
14W–25L · 41.6% of games
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 61% of games
8.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 39.3% of games
7.0mixed
84%
21W–4L · 66.8% of games
8.0mixed
31.5%
17W–37L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer