← Search

Lorraine Marks

— year-end
90 matches · 52W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lorraine Marks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Palisoc/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynne Barkeloo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Barkeloo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexis Woodward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-20 · Barkeloo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynne Barkeloo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · Barkeloo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Shipp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-29 · Barkeloo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynne Barkeloo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · Marks-Wheeler/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Geismar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · Marks-Wheeler/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regina Hickl-Szabo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-02 · Marks-Wheeler/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Geismar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-28 · NOGTA/Jill Joyce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Joyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-13 · NOGTA/Jill Joyce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kennisha Cann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-08 · Young/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Biondolillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-07 · NOGTA/Jill Joyce · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawanna Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.3% of games
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 56.8% of games
4.0
50%
13W–13L · 46.8% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.8% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova