← Search

Terry Bartley

— year-end
51 matches · 34W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Terry Bartley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Bray/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Mark Cooper / Donna Wolfanger
2026-07-11 · Jackson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marnie Denman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · Jackson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marnie Denman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Cooper/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with ROBERT LEBLANC
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · Vachon-Lau/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Rubinstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · Cooper/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Gallimore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · Roedel/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with ROBERT LEBLANC
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Michael McKenna / Michael Aragones
2026-04-19 · Cooper/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Heard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-12 · Vachon-Lau/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · Roedel/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with ROBERT LEBLANC
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-23 · Cooper/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with ROBERT LEBLANC
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Cooper/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Roedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams79 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 57.1% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.1% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.5% of games
3.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams