← Search

Brenda Nigh

Pittsburgh, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 37W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brenda Nigh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Oxford Sureshots · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Mighty Angels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Stratil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-14 · Slice Girls · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Astbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Doretta Bish / Patricia Dudek
2026-07-12 · Oxford Sureshots · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Siao Shick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · Mighty Angels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Divers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
Jasmine Trouten / Doretta Bish
2026-06-18 · Mighty Angels · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Stratil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · Mighty Angels · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anita Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · Oxford Sureshots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-13 · Slice Girls · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Ehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · Mighty Angels · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Siao Shick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Astbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Astbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.4% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 29.7% of games
7.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.2% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 35.3% of games
7.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer