← Search

Dianna Finisecy

Selbyville, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 26W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dianna Finisecy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Beach Babes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Desimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Beach Babes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Desimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-28 · Beach Babes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean BRadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · Beach Babes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Goldy Austen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-31 · Beach Babes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean BRadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Kahler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean BRadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Desimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Sharon MacUci / Ruth Haynes
2025-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Desimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Mindy Oxman / Mary Brennan-Jones
2025-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean BRadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Ruth Haynes / Sharon MacUci
2025-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elyse Sharpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean BRadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 33.5% of games
6.0
55.8%
24W–19L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe