← Search

Chris Wideman

Houston, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 8W–14L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Chris Wideman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-04-25 · Wideman 4.0-Woodlands · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-3
L
2025-10-30 · Missouri City · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Drew Miller / Clifford Muckleroy
2025-10-16 · Missouri City · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with TROY JEFFERSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-02 · Missouri City · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mert Ozcan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kenneth Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Werner Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
James Robinson
2025-07-13 · Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands Parks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-8
L
James Robinson
2025-07-13 · Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands Parks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-3
L
2025-06-28 · Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands Parks · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-8
L
2025-06-22 · Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Inting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-8
L
2025-06-14 · Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Inting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-8
L
2025-06-14 · Wideman 4.0 - Woodlands Parks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Inting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 37.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
10 matches
#1 Singles
18%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams