← Search

Elizabeth Langham

North Yarmouth, ME
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 72W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Langham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Apex:KayCat:Mehler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · Apex:KayCat:Mehler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · Apex:KayCat:Mehler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catalina Mehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-17 · Apex:GameChangers:Crosby · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelley Massey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Apex:GameChangers:Crosby · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kayla Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Apex:GameChangers:Crosby · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Francesca Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-22 · Apex:SwitchSisters:Crosby · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Otis-Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · Apex:SwitchSisters:Crosby · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catalina Mehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · Apex:SwitchSisters:Crosby · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Pelletier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · Apex:NetAssets:Doyle · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Matt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-25 · Apex:SwitchSisters:Crosby · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-24 · Apex:NetAssets:Doyle · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.1%
38W–31L · 52.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 57.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
21W–14L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
2W–16L · 35.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
25 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova