← Search

Erica Bose

Phoenixville, PA
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 8W–15L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Erica Bose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2023-06-01 · Crazy Croakers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Salvo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Catherine Grimes / Helen Lee
2023-05-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Ostafy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-05-04 · Crazy Croakers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Moser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-04-27 · Crazy Croakers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Mateyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
Lisa Kuhnle / Kiran Penmetsa
2022-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Mateyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-02 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Dungan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2022-05-19 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Kearney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-05 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Pantaleo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2022-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Mateyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2021-05-13 · Crazy Croakers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Levenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 4-6
L
2021-05-06 · Crazy Croakers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Pantaleo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
34.8%
8W–15L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer