← Search

Dana Johnson

Stonington, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 80W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-06-20 · LS: C Squared: Conway · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · LS: C Squared: Conway · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Kenney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-07 · LS: C Squared: Conway · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Kenney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · MIS: Cosgriff/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Cosgriff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5
W
2026-04-26 · LS: C Squared: Conway · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Kenney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · MIS: Cosgriff/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Cosgriff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-25 · MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Steppan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · LS: C Squared: Conway · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · MIS: Mighty Mystics: Frickman/Steppan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Belliveau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-07 · MIS: Cosgriff/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Cosgriff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-21 · MIS:Mighty Mystics:Frickman/Steppan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Steppan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-15 · MIS:Mighty Mystics:Frickman/Steppan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.1% of games
3.5
75.7%
28W–9L · 62.1% of games
4.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 46.4% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.7%
32W–12L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer