← Search

Karen Mitchell

— year-end
54 matches · 28W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Mitchell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
Cathy Williams / Diane Ross
2026-07-16 · A55 6.0W CC Bell · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alicia Desantis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · A55 6.0W CC Bell · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marni LICURSI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · A55 6.0W CC Bell · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Trzcinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · A55 6.0W CC Bell · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Cleminson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · A18 3.0W CC1 Lammers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-08 · C 5.5W CC Bell · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Debra Speicher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-05 · C 5.5W CC Bell · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Linda Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-09-21 · C 5.5W CC Bell · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Linda Marous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-03 · A40 3.0W CC Stoica · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Felicia Norman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-13 · A40 3.0W CC Stoica · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iuliana Grosescu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-04-11 · A18 3.0W CC1 Novick · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Cleminson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-04-04 · A18 3.0W CC1 Novick · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawnee Domonkos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 65.6% of games
3.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.1% of games
5.5
55%
11W–9L · 49% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer