← Search

Janet Krech

Fort Collins, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 47W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Krech to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-07-29 · LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Sale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-29 · LT BLACK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · LT PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Anne Kempton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · LT BLACK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Sale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · LT YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Migchelbrink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · LT BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Spicer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · LT YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Migchelbrink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-07 · LT SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Massaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-23 · LT SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Sale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-18 · LT YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Heckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
49.4%
44W–45L · 50.2% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King