← Search

Michael Cecil

— year-end
77 matches · 49W–28L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Michael Cecil to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-08-08 · Blackburn (John Mills)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuesheng Qu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · Blackburn (John Mills)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Robida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · Blackburn (John Mills)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carter Holcombe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with John Mills championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Kyle Wade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Tyler Darby / Joe Johnson
2026-07-17 · #4 Doubles · with Richard Nielsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · #4 Doubles · with John Mills championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Alex Bernick / Alexander Zachos
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuesheng Qu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · #4 Doubles · with Richard Nielsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Thomas Curry / Sal Lopez
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · with Jonathan Bennett championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
Mohamed Chala / Laurent Guitton
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · with Jonathan Ravenelle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
65.7%
46W–24L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert