← Search

Mary Tudryn

— year-end
142 matches · 60W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Tudryn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
W
2026-06-20 · BAY: High Fives:MacColl · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Gottlieb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · ETC:One Hit Wonders 55+:Rakas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Hamlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · LTC:Spin Sisters 40+: Tudyrn/Ruell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Beaudoin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · A_ETC:One Hit Wonders:Dygon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 2-4
W
2026-06-09 · ETC:One Hit Wonders 55+:Rakas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Grocott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · ETC:One Hit Wonders 55+:Rakas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Grocott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · BAY: High Fives:MacColl · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mika Inoue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · ETC:Tennis Nuts: Grocott/Maynard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cassandra Crowal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · LTC:Spin Sisters 18+:Ruell/Tudryn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Rakas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · ETC:One Hit Wonders 55+:Rakas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Szlajen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · ETC:One Hit Wonders 55+:Rakas · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mika Inoue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · LTC:Spin Sisters 18+:Ruell/Tudryn · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 57.5% of games
3.5
28.6%
20W–50L · 42.7% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.4% of games
6.0
100%
10W–0L · 71.5% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.5% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40.6%
13W–19L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova