← Search

Caleb Fahrner

DENVER, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 49W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caleb Fahrner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-09-02 · TTA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Flanigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · TTA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Pickup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · TTA GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · TTA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Pickup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · TTA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Flanigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · TTA RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · TTA RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Wittkowske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · TTA RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Pickup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · TTA RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zenas Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2025-09-03 · TTA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Wittkowske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-27 · TTA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Wittkowske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-08-07 · TTA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Pickup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 61.8% of games
4.0
60.3%
38W–25L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer