← Search

Sharon Hargreaves

— year-end
78 matches · 28W–50L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Sharon Hargreaves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Gardendale - Zassoda · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Speigle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · Gardendale - Hargreaves · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Gardendale - Hargreaves/Wesley Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacy Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · BH - Zassoda · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Wilkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-0
W
2026-06-07 · BH - Zassoda · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Wilkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-1
L
2026-05-11 · Gardendale - Hargreaves · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alisha Pickle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · Gardendale - Zassoda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Mcgill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · Gardendale - Zassoda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-14 · Gardendale - Zassoda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacy Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · Gardendale - Hargreaves · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Heron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-07 · Gardendale - Zassoda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Speigle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · Gardendale - Hargreaves · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Heron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Teams69 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
35.8%
19W–34L · 43.7% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 36.5% of games
5.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.5% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams