← Search

Marie-Louise Watson

— year-end
14 matches · 6W–8L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Marie-Louise Watson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
Debi Foley / Kathy Smith
2026-07-07 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ridgely Fisk Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Weinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Jacquelyn McKellar / Jocel Thornhill
2021-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2021-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 6-2
L
2021-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Carla Hamilton / Janet Riddick
2021-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Denbo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2020-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Oldland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2020-01-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Civia Gerber / Colleen Sugar
2019-12-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Oldland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 3-6
L
2019-12-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Oldland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 3-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert