← Search

Mike Logan

— year-end
289 matches · 215W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mike Logan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history289 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Hatch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-30 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Hatch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Sports Mall-Granger/Osley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Ollivier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · Sports Mall-Vos/Ellis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · Sports Mall-Vos/Ellis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Hatch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-24 · SM- Henderson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Miranda Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · Sports Mall-Vos/Ellis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffery Scott Niederhauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · with Lindsay Knight championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · with Lindsay Knight championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · with Lindsay Knight championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.2% of games
3.5
82%
41W–9L · 60.1% of games
4.0
71.9%
82W–32L · 56% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 35.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.8% of games
7.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
73.7%
28W–10L · 60% of games
8.5mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
119 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
80 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova