← Search

Jennifer Gleason

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
262 matches · 130W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Gleason to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history262 matches
W
2026-08-09 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Cunningham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Frace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Frace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Vermeys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Russell Terao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Frace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Norris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-06 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Frace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shani Ma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Norris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-07 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Billi Dunning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.6% of games
3.5
62.9%
39W–23L · 55.2% of games
4.0
50%
48W–48L · 46.9% of games
8.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 45% of games
6.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 51.5% of games
7.5mixed
51.9%
14W–13L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 42.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
73 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova