← Search

Jason Wessman

Farmington, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 34W–16L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jason Wessman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-08-14 · Tennis Nuts · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amanda Wessman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Liberty Park-Visser · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Chytraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Tennis Nuts · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amanda Wessman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · Liberty Park-Visser · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Carlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-22 · Liberty Park-Visser · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sameer Bhadouria
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · Tennis Nuts · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amanda Wessman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-15 · Liberty Park-Visser · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neal Webster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · Liberty Park-Visser · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sameer Bhadouria
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-26 · Tennis Nuts · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amanda Wessman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Sameer Bhadouria championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · Liberty Park-Visser · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Carlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-05 · OAC-MI6 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amanda Wessman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 59.5% of games
5.5mixed
100%
8W–0L · 73.5% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal