← Search

Duane Cagle

Aurora, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 48W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Duane Cagle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-09-02 · HRCA-N GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · HRCA-N GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · HRCA-N GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Purdum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · HRCA-N GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · HRCA-N GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · HRCA-N NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sadras Senthilvel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · HRCA-N NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Nutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · HRCA-N NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Harllee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · HRCA-N NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · HRCA-N NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Nutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-10 · HRCA-N NAVY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Mike Wilson
2026-05-13 · HRCA-N BLUE · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
38.8%
38W–60L · 46.6% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.4% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.9% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 51.7% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
3W–15L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams