← Search

Tammy Pronenko

— year-end
118 matches · 63W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tammy Pronenko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-05-28 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Barr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Knoblach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Flanagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells/Tammy Pronenko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Barr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maureen Jaramillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
L
2026-03-30 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Matkin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Kaump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Matkin · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-25 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Tallett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ashley la Shelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
67.2%
45W–22L · 56.8% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 45.1% of games
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe